The Ethical Vision of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: Eudaimonia, Virtue, and the Good Life

I. Introduction

Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics is one of the foundational texts in Western moral philosophy. Composed around the 4th century BCE and named after either his father or his son Nicomachus, the work represents Aristotle’s mature thought on the nature of human flourishing (eudaimonia), moral virtue (aretē), rational deliberation, and the role of community in ethical life. Unlike abstract moral theories, Aristotle’s ethics is grounded in the practical realities of human life and deeply concerned with how to live well as a human being.

This essay examines the key components of the Nicomachean Ethics, focusing on its understanding of happiness, virtue, the doctrine of the mean, practical reason (phronēsis), and the relationship between ethics and politics. We will also assess its enduring influence in contemporary moral philosophy.

II. The Human Good: Eudaimonia as the Ultimate End

At the heart of Aristotle’s ethical inquiry lies the question: “What is the highest good for human beings?” He asserts that all actions aim at some good, but among these goods, there must be one that is ultimate and complete in itself. That good is eudaimonia, often translated as “happiness,” “flourishing,” or “well-being.”

However, Aristotle does not equate eudaimonia with mere pleasure or wealth. Rather, eudaimonia is the activity of the soul in accordance with virtue, over a complete life. It is a life of rational excellence, not a temporary emotional state or external possession.

“The good for man is an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue, in a complete life.”
— Nicomachean Ethics, I.7

This concept situates ethics not in rules or outcomes, but in the quality of life lived through the actualization of human capacities, especially reason.

III. Moral Virtue and the Doctrine of the Mean

Aristotle divides virtues into two broad categories: moral virtues (such as courage, temperance, generosity) and intellectual virtues (such as wisdom, understanding, and prudence). Moral virtues are acquired through habit (ethos), not innate or purely rational.

The most famous element of his virtue theory is the Doctrine of the Mean, where virtue is understood as a mean between two extremes of excess and deficiency. For example:

Courage is the mean between cowardice (deficiency) and rashness (excess).
Temperance is the mean between insensibility and self-indulgence.

Importantly, this mean is not mathematically precise but relative to the individual and the situation, requiring practical wisdom to discern.

Aristotle stresses that one does not become virtuous by knowing the theory but by practicing it:

“We become just by doing just actions, temperate by doing temperate actions, brave by doing brave actions.”
— NE, II.1

Thus, virtue ethics is fundamentally action-oriented, grounded in character development through habituation.

IV. Phronēsis: Practical Wisdom and Moral Deliberation

Moral virtue alone is insufficient for achieving eudaimonia. It must be coupled with practical wisdom (phronēsis), which enables one to make sound moral judgments in complex and variable situations.

Unlike theoretical wisdom (sophia), which concerns universal truths, phronēsis is concerned with the particulars of human action—what is good or bad in concrete circumstances. A person with phronēsis not only knows what the right thing is but knows how and when to do it.

“It is not enough to know about virtue; one must also possess and apply it.”
— NE, VI.13

Thus, phronēsis is the intellectual virtue that integrates ethical principles with life experience, distinguishing Aristotle’s ethics from purely abstract moral systems.

V. Friendship, Politics, and the Good Life

In Books VIII and IX, Aristotle turns to the topic of friendship (philia), which he considers essential to the good life. True friendship, based on mutual virtue and goodwill, is not only pleasurable and useful but also morally enriching. Friends serve as mirrors, helping each other grow in virtue.

Moreover, Aristotle connects ethics to politics, as both aim at the human good. The polis (city-state) provides the necessary conditions for ethical life: education, laws, and community. For Aristotle, a just society is one that enables its citizens to live virtuously.

“Man is by nature a political animal.”
— Politics, I.2

Thus, Nicomachean Ethics is not merely a personal moral guide but a foundation for civic and political life.

VI. Relevance and Legacy

Aristotle’s ethics has profoundly influenced Christian theology (e.g., Aquinas), Islamic philosophy (e.g., Averroes), and modern virtue ethics (e.g., Alasdair MacIntyre, Philippa Foot, Martha Nussbaum). Its key contribution lies in reconnecting ethics with human nature, community, and lifelong character formation.

In contrast to utilitarianism or deontology, Aristotle’s virtue ethics asks not “What ought I to do?” but “What kind of person ought I to become?” This shift emphasizes ethical development as a process, deeply tied to one's identity, goals, and community.

In contemporary debates on character education, leadership, or well-being, Nicomachean Ethics continues to offer a rich, realistic, and human-centered vision of morality.

VII. Conclusion

Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics is a masterwork of philosophical anthropology and practical reasoning. It presents ethics not as a cold calculus or divine command, but as the art of living well—a lifelong project of cultivating virtue in accordance with reason and within community.

By rooting morality in human nature and activity, Aristotle invites us not just to obey rules but to shape ourselves into excellent human beings, aiming always for the good, the true, and the beautiful. In an age of moral uncertainty and ethical fragmentation, his insights remain timeless and urgent.

이 블로그 검색

twins