Peter Abelard’s Sic et Non: The Birth of Scholastic Disputation and the Challenge of Reason
Peter Abelard’s Sic et Non: The Birth of Scholastic Disputation and the Challenge of Reason
I. Introduction – The Dawn of Medieval Rationalism
Peter Abelard (1079–1142) was one of the most controversial and influential thinkers of the early Middle Ages. His work Sic et Non (“Yes and No”) marked a dramatic turning point in the intellectual history of the 12th century. By presenting conflicting authorities—particularly statements from the Church Fathers—Sic et Non challenged readers to move beyond passive acceptance and engage in critical analysis and logical inquiry.
This work boldly explored the tensions between faith and reason, tradition and interpretation, and authority and logic, laying the foundation for what would become the scholastic method in medieval philosophy and theology.
II. Structure and Method – Questioning Authority
Sic et Non presents around 158 theological questions, each followed by quotations that support and contradict a particular answer. For instance:
-
“Can God be seen?”
-
“Is faith prior to reason?”
-
“Is the Son inferior to the Father?”
Importantly, Abelard does not resolve these contradictions. Instead, he challenges readers to investigate them through rational analysis, encouraging them to consider context, terminology, and conceptual clarity. In the preface, he famously writes:
“In seeking truth, the first step is to place both sides of the question in opposition.”
— Sic et Non, Preface
This approach eventually shaped the scholastic disputatio model, consisting of question, objection, argument, and resolution—a structure later perfected in Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae.
III. The Fusion of Theology and Logic
Abelard was one of the first medieval thinkers to apply formal logic (logica) to theology. Drawing on Boethius, Aristotle, and Porphyry, he utilized the tools of dialectic to analyze theological propositions.
-
He emphasized that the same term can have different meanings in different contexts, and that apparent contradictions in patristic texts often stemmed from linguistic ambiguity.
-
Through a semantic and propositional analysis, he showed that many theological disputes could be clarified or resolved through attention to logical form and precision.
This rational method implicitly undermined the infallibility of tradition, suggesting that even revered authorities could err if misunderstood or misapplied.
IV. Faith and Reason – Toward Understanding
Beyond Sic et Non, Abelard developed a broader theological vision centered on the principle of “faith seeking understanding”, but with a more reason-centered emphasis than Anselm. Whereas Anselm said, “I believe in order to understand”, Abelard affirmed that understanding deepens belief, and that reason plays a central role in illuminating faith.
He argued that faith is not blind submission, but an invitation to pursue theological clarity through logical reflection and discourse. In his time, this was radical—and dangerous. He was accused of heresy and nearly executed, yet his vision of an intellectually responsible theology endured.
Abelard’s approach laid the groundwork for thinkers such as Albert the Great, Thomas Aquinas, and later William of Ockham, shaping the intellectual framework of medieval universities.
V. Legacy and Influence – Foundations of Scholasticism
The legacy of Sic et Non can be summarized in four key contributions:
-
It introduced problem-based learning into theological education.
-
It challenged the primacy of authority, favoring logical consistency.
-
It proposed a synthesis of theology, philosophy, and logic.
-
It served as a template for the scholastic method in subsequent centuries.
Abelard’s dialectical style became integral to the rise of the University of Paris, influencing both pedagogy and curriculum. His intellectual courage opened the path for a new form of theological engagement that respected both faith and reason.
VI. Conclusion – Wrestling Between Faith and Intellect
Peter Abelard’s Sic et Non is not merely a record of medieval disputes. It is a manifesto for rational faith—a bold affirmation that truth can and must be examined through critical thought. Abelard was not afraid to ask questions, even when they unsettled ecclesiastical comfort.
His legacy is the reclamation of reason as a partner in the pursuit of divine truth. Today, Sic et Non remains foundational for anyone seeking to integrate philosophical clarity with theological conviction.
“To approach truth, one must begin by confronting contradiction.”
— Abelard
댓글
댓글 쓰기